FedEx Express: Derailed or Just Delayed?
Theory 1: Delayed
Ok so Fed went down in the final to an upstart kid we all had our eye on. Del Potro was on a mission. After all, he beat down Nadal in the semis, even if it was Nadal at about 60%, and nobody has ever beaten Fed and Nadal in a single slam. We can liken this Open to Kuerten winning the French a couple times in the midst of Sampras' glory. Fed won two slams this year, and as Pete himself used to say, 'a good year is when I win one slam, a great year is when I win two'. Even by Fed's closest historical competition, this was a great year for Fed. He's never been seriously injured, he is in the heart of his prime slam winning years, and the stability in his family will propel him to several more slams in the next 3 years. Also, his ballerina movement allows him to play brutal matches without significant strain on the body. Players only beat Fed when they're in the 'tree' and he's playing less than Federesque tennis, and even then it's no sure win. Look for Fed to win another couple of Slams in '09.
Theory 2: Derailed
We saw a true changing of the guard Monday. It reminded me of watching Safin absolutely blast Pistol Pete from the Open final court near the end of Pete's reign. Once Del Potro found his groove, we saw the chinks in Fed's armor: he's capable of being blasted off the court.(see generally, Safin v. Fed when Safin's not high) His game can look anemic at times, he's slowing down a step or two, and he's struggling to 'get up' on his serve. And, Del Potro didn't turn on the jets until mid-way through the 4th set. A relaxed Del Potro, the one we will likely see in his next Slam appearances, will have the guns and mentality to dismiss Fed in quick order.
Perhaps the biggest knock on Fed are the his kids. While it may be hard to hold it against him from a human perspective, Fed's looking outside the court these days. He's established himself as the greatest player of all time (in my mind anyway). Early in his career, Fed himself talked about the battle against history, and that battle is over. Without that 'eternal' motivation, Fed will be a repeat 'mark' for younger guns like Del Potro, Cilic, Nadal, and even Soderling. Every King loses their crown eventually, and Fed's time is up.
I'm not sure. I didn't like what I saw on Monday, but what do you think?
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
I vote delayed.
I think del Potro is another Safin type, I think that’s a good comparison. He’s capable of putting it all together, but he’s capable of misfiring and having questionable heart. Safin only won one more major after thrashing Sampras.
I think del Potro has maybe two or three more in him, but I don’t think he’s going to become any sort of kryptonite like Nadal.
The Daily Forehand -- SB Nation's Tennis Destination.
Broad Street Hockey.
by Ben Rothenberg on Sep 15, 2009 3:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am going to be extremely bold here. I think DelPo will win 7+ majors and be a dominant #1 player in three or two years. Even Pete needed some maturing after wining the USO at a young age (ala DelPo).
More on the point-just delayed. He served terribley in set 5 and DelPo was ripping 108 mph forehands. I think this a case of a bad day that was a major final. All credit DelPo.
by Jsz on Sep 15, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah I couldn’t believe how badly he served. And he just never got it together. Plenty of times he’s looked like junk early or in the middle, but I haven’t seen too many times when Fed was just garbage from the middle through the end.
"I swear to God, I'll take this ******* ball and shove it down your ******* throat" - Serena Williams
by lcollins1 on Sep 16, 2009 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think its hard to say someone’s career is over after just one match. Maybe he should pull a Kim Clijsters and take two years of to spend with his kids, then he will come back and win a major or two!
by carmaj21 on Sep 17, 2009 10:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 








