World #1 Slums It Up In Slovenia

There's something to be said for having big name players show up to small tournaments to promote the game. It helps tennis gain roots in non-traditional markets, and lets fans in far flung locales see world class tennis in their own part of the world.
But when the big name player in question is a world #1 hearing increasingly loud criticism that her ranking is unjustified due to her inability to win the biggest tournaments, the decision is a little more questionable.
Dinara Safina is not only the only top ten player entered in this week's in Banka Koper Slovenia Open in Portoroz, Slovenia--she's only one of two entrants inside the top twenty (the second, twentieth ranked Anabel Medina Garrigues, barely fits in that category). It's almost as if Safina heard Serena Williams' sarcastic remarks about Safina deserving the #1 ranking because "she won Berlin and Madrid" and decided that the joke needed a better punchline.
While Safina spends her time in the second-least populated of the former Yugoslav nations, the rest of the top flight of women's tennis is preparing for next week's Premier level tournament in Stanford, a tournament Safina is not playing. The field at Stanford includes Serena Williams, Venus Williams, Elena Dementieva, Jelena Jankovic, Samantha Stosur, Nadia Petrova, Dominika Cibulkova, Agnieszka Radwanska, Marion Bartoli, and Na Li. Every one of those players is ranked above anyone Safina might face in Slovenia. That list doesn't even include other Stanford participants like Maria Sharapova and Sabine Lisicki, both of whom are much scarier opponents than an Anabel Medina Garrigues or a Kaia Kanepi.
Portoroz, Slovenia sounds a lot more desolate than it is, in fairness. It's less than ten miles from Italy, and only about sixty miles of the Adriatic Sea separate the tournament from Venice. And Safina has been training in nearby Croatia for some time now, the home country of her coach, Zeljko Krajan.
But Portoroz is still Portoroz. Safina winning the title this week in Slovenia would only confirm her propensity for winning only the smaller titles in the eyes of her many critics, and would make her even more of a laughingstock .
And since that's how bad it would be if she wins, I can't even begin to imagine what the reaction will be if she loses.
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Comments
Vaclav
by Vaclav on Jul 22, 2009 2:56 PM EDT reply actions
I agree, playing at these itty, bitty, sh*tty tournaments with no tough players in them is, I think, not a terrific career move. They can’t even do much to help her confidence. Big fish, small pond. DInara is in a very strange position. She could win every tournament she enters for the rest of the year, including the YEC but if she fails to win the US Open, she’ll still be thought of as undeserving of the #1 ranking. It’s kind of a put-up or shut-up thing. We know you can win big tournaments, but show us you can win a Slam! Any slam! Does she want to be Jelena Jankovic or Ana Ivanovic (or Steffi Graf)?
But I will concede that DInara deserves the #1 ranking. She just doesn’t deserve to be called the best player in the world. And that disparity drives lots of people, myself included, crazy.
Yeah after hearing Billie Jean King talk about the need for the ranking to reflect who supports tour events (paraphrasing), I agree that it’s tough for Safina not to have the #1 ranking.
Maybe she should just be called “the player with the most points in the last 52 weeks.”—I think that would be a lot less controversial…
The Daily Forehand -- SB Nation's Tennis Destination.
Broad Street Hockey.
by Ben Rothenberg on Jul 24, 2009 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions

by 













